A
large body of research has supported the reliability and
validity of the Personal Behaviour Inventory and the
DISC FACTORS.
This
research has provided evidence of high test-retest
reliability (the stability of test scores over time);
strong Construct Validity (the relationship of the
Personal Behaviour Inventory to other tests measuring
similar constructs); robust content validity (how well
the DISC
FACTORS measure what they are supposed to measure);
significant criterion or predictive validity (the
ability of the DISC FACTORS to
predict performance on another activity); and powerful
construct validity (the extent to which the DISC FACTORS
measure a specific trait).
The research
findings on test-retest reliability show that the
scores on the Personal Behaviour Inventory DISC System exhibit
very little change over time.
Six-month
test-retest correlations average in the .90 range where
a correlation of 1.0 is a perfect relationship
(absolutely no change) and .0 is no relationship (random
change). The Personal Behaviour Inventory is a reliable
instrument that consistently measures the same thing.
Construct
and concurrent validity studies have compared the
Personal Behaviour Inventory with other Four Factor
instruments
such
as the Discus Personality Profiler, Personal Profile
Analysis and TTI ‘s Style. Significant correlations have
been found across all four DISC FACTORS.
This indicates that the Personal Behaviour Inventory
validly assesses constructs measured by other Four
Factor assessment instruments.
Research
on content validity has shown that the DISC FACTORS can
differentiate good performances from poor performances.
This
ability to differentiate has been shown in studies as
diverse as sales performance, production operators and
team leaders in a number of industries. The Personal
Behaviour Inventory can successfully distinguish varying
levels of performance.
Criterion
or predictive validity studies have looked at the
ability of various DISC FACTORS to
predict outcomes.
Outcome measures as diverse as sales performance,
retention rates and job performance have been predicted
with a high degree of accuracy on the basis of DISC
scores. This ability to predict makes the Personal
Behaviour Inventory a very valuable tool in selection
and management, providing it is used alongside good
interviewing techniques, and good aptitude
tests
Strong
Construct Validity is shown when the instrument
consistently exhibits content validity, concurrent
validity and predictive validity. The research shows the
Personal Behaviour Inventory to be a construct valid
instrument.
A
recent study provides an excellent example of validity
of the DISC
FACTORS of the Personal Behaviour
Inventory. Top sales people (N=136) were
compared with a sample of
other professional workers (N=
450)on the DISC Profile. The two
groups were found to differ significantly on all DISC FACTORS. Each
of the dimensions of the DISC Profile contributed to the
ability to distinguish top sales people from other
workers. This study showed that the Personal Behaviour
Inventory can identify specific characteristics that are
predictive of success.
A
review of the extensive research that has been conducted
on the Personal Behaviour Inventory conclusively shows
that the Personal Behaviour Inventory Instrument is a
reliable and valid assessment device with a wide range
of applications.
Reliability
Estimates
Using
the Spearman-Brown “split-halves reliability
coefficient,” reliability estimates were
obtained.
This
coefficient indicates the degree of internal consistency
of response to the instrument as a whole. The
coefficients for each dimension are as follows:
·
Dominance r
= .93
·
Influence r =
.79
·
Steadiness
r = .84
·
Compliance r
= .82
These
reliability coefficients indicate that there is an
unusually high degree of internal consistency in
response to the Personal Behaviour Inventory Instrument
as a whole and to each of the related dimensions. A
significant measure of the correlation is indicated by
the size of the coefficient. The coefficient can vary
from +1.00 through 0 to –1.00. A coefficient near 0
tells us that there is no relationship between the
variables. The closer a coefficient is to + or – 1.00,
the stronger the relationship.
Correlation Examples for our DISC
Profiling
System
|
+/-1.0
|
=
Perfect correlation (extremely rare)
|
|
+/-.80
- .99
|
=
Unusually high correlation
|
|
+/-.70
- .79
|
=
Very high correlation
|
|
+/-.60
- .69
|
=
High correlation
|
|
+/-.30
- .59
|
=
Moderately high correlation
|
|
+/-.20
- .29
|
=
Very low correlation
|
|
+/-.00
- .19
|
=
No correlation
|